Pastortnew

Sir I came here humbly, I asked your position on the above posted text, I never disrespected, nor did I insult any one on this thread. I made sure to ask what you believed, so that I could directly address that view.

I do not your recent reply to my earlier post reflects the mind of Christ nor do I believe it to be beneficial to the body of Christ.

Soli Deo gloria
TN

Don Johnson thank you but anarthrous definitions are not necessary I am a 3rd semester Greek student. And although I enjoy Daniel Wallace’s work (especially his refutation of Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman) you would be far better served (definition wise) using A manual grammar of the Greek NT by Dana and Mantey or for an earlier perspective James Hope Moulton’s formative work on lexicography or Deissmann’s formative work on Koine Grammar.

As far as the arguments posted above I’ll deal with them in detail as soon as possible.
Kristen I regrettably cannot get into a lengthly discourse at this time I am in the middle of a major project but as the Lord provides time I’ll try my best to get to it.

again, thank you for your time and attention.
you are loved in Christ

I don’t want to get into Phil’s blog post (mainly because I’m not sure I agree with it in its entirety). But I would like to ask you about 1 Timothy 2 beginning in verse 9 the word of the Lord reads, ” 9 Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments, 10 but rather by means of good works, as is proper for women making a claim to godliness. 11 A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. 12 But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. 13 For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve. 14 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression. 15 But women will be preserved through the bearing of children if they continue in faith and love and sanctity with self-restraint.” (NASB 95)

Would you please explain to me why this text says, “A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.”

Please be detailed in your response dealing with the immediate context.

Please understand I’m not here to antagonize anyone I’m just wondering how you exegetically deal with this text.

As far as “Discernment” goes I’m going to need you to be more specific are you saying that Women are discerning in the general sense or are you asserting that women have been given the spiritual gift of discernment?
would you explain that to me in light of 1 Tim. 2:9-15?

Thank you for your time and attention,
you are loved in Christ