Style Argument 2: The passage interrupts the flow of instructions about prophets -- rebutted

Some argue that 1 Corinthians 14 discusses tongues then prophecy continuously, and the women passage breaks this flow -- allegedly explaining why a scribe moved the verses. Mike responds: (1) removing passages because they break flow would eliminate many parts of scripture; (2) ancient writers did not use footnotes; (3) the judging prophecy view shows it does not break the flow at all -- it is part of the prophecy discussion.