Payne correctly refutes a bad complementarian argument that God naming the human race 'man' (adam) in Genesis 5:2 implies male leadership.
Payne identifies a weak complementarian argument
Some complementarians claim that God naming humanity 'man' (adam) in Genesis 5:2 implies male leadership. Mike agrees with Payne that this is a bad argument. In Hebrew, 'adam' is an inclusive term that can refer to both men and women (mankind/human). Woman is a kind of human, not a kind of male. Genesis 1 establishes this inclusive usage.
← Previous
Payne's third argument: father and mother sharing authority
Next →Introduction to Tom Schreiner's six reasons from Genesis 2 f
Responses
Scripture Commentary
tweet
@TSubasLawVX @squishy203 Genesis is written in Hebrew. “He created them male an
@TSubasLawVX @squishy203 Genesis is written in Hebrew. “He created them male and female and blessed them. And he named them ‘Adam’ when they were created” (Gen 5:2).
Scripture Commentary
tweet
As many of you rightly noted, Genesis 1:26-27 is unequivocal that both the man and the woman are created in God's image. Let's take a look at this passage again to make this certain. Before we do, in Gen 5:2, we are told that "[God] created them ma...
As many of you rightly noted, Genesis 1:26-27 is unequivocal that both the man and the woman are created in God's image. Let's take a look at this passage again to make this certain. Before we do, i
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Was Women's Submission Just a Curse to Be Overturned？ Women in Ministry part 2 @ 00:31:102022-03-14