Egalitarian argument: 'I do not permit' is Paul's personal opinion
ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15: Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this)
00:33:15 – 00:38:00
Mike addresses the claim that epitrepo ('I permit') indicates Paul expressing a personal, non-binding opinion.
Philip Payne and Linda Belleville argue that 'I do not permit' (ouk epitrepo) is Paul speaking personally, not issuing a universal command. They contrast it with stronger language Paul uses elsewhere (like 'I command'). The argument is that Paul is expressing a temporary, situational restriction that does not bind the church universally. Mike will rebut this by examining how epitrepo functions in Paul's writings and in the broader NT.
← Previous
Egalitarian overview of the passage
Next →Rebuttal: 'I do not permit' is apostolic authority, not mere
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15: Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this) @ 00:33:152023-11-22