Methodology: neither defending nor attacking Bethel — the goal is clarity by taking them at their word
Mike distinguishes his approach from two common failure modes in critiquing Bethel
Mike identifies two problematic approaches others take: (1) defending Bethel individuals without examining their actual teachings; (2) attacking and demonizing them. His stated goal is clarity — taking their words at face value, with integrity, without looking for hidden demonic conspiracies.
← Previous
Introduction: purpose is biblical analysis of Bill Johnson,
Next →Avoiding guilt by association: Bill Johnson and Benny Hinn s
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Scripture Commentary
article
Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz
## Challenging my position that 1 Timothy 2:15 is a single woman
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more