LDS apologist argument #3: Smith did not 'translate' in the conventional sense — he was receiving spiritual impressions triggered by the images
Third main LDS apologetic counter-argument
Mike describes the third LDS apologetic argument: that Smith's 'translation' was not a word-for-word decipherment of the hieroglyphs but rather a meditative/revelatory process. According to this view, Smith looked at the images (e.g., the figure on the table) and received spiritual impressions or revelations triggered by them — seeing how the Egyptians pictured certain concepts and receiving divine insight about Abraham. Mike notes this argument is now actually promoted on lds.org.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more