Isaiah 53 'seed/offspring': Ra's internal contradiction — he can't use Israel as both subject and the seed
Ra claims Jesus had no descendants ('seed') as required, and that 'seed' in Isaiah refers to physical offspring of Israel, not Jesus's followers
Mike exposes a logical inconsistency: Ra argues Isaiah 53 is about Israel, but then interprets 'seed' as referring to Israel's future children — making Israel both the Suffering Servant and the result of the Suffering Servant's work. The internal logic breaks down. Additionally, the New Testament consistently uses new birth language (being 'born again') to describe believers as spiritual offspring of Christ. Christians who are saved through Christ's sacrifice are his 'seed' in a theological sense.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more