Why didn't Bible prophecy predict airplanes or the internet? The Bible was meant to be evidence for all generations across history, not optimized for the 21st century.
Ra asks why 'seers' who could foresee the distant future never mentioned modern technology.
Winger's answer: if a prophecy refers to something fulfilled 2,000+ years in the future, it is useless as evidence to everyone who lived before that fulfillment. A prediction about airplanes would only be verifiable to people alive after 1903 — no value to billions of humans in prior centuries. By contrast, a prophecy about the destruction of Tyre, fulfilled within 300 years, is accessible to many more generations. The Bible's prophetic program is calibrated to be verifiable across the full sweep of human history. He would not present Daniel's 'many will go to and fro, knowledge will increase' as proof of airplanes because it is too vague to meet the criteria he already established.
← Previous
Ra's 'missing books of the Bible' argument is characterized
Next →Ra's appeal to Quranic prophecy is self-refuting: the Quran'
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: “Women Keep Silent” (1 Cor 14:34–35)
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 11 on 'women keep silent' in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35
Scripture Commentary
article
Questioning the Bible: 11 Major Challenges to the Bible''s Authority
Jonathan Morrow — Kindle highlights from 'Questioning the Bible: 11 Major Challenges to the Bible''s Authority'. 39 highlights.
Scripture Commentary
article
Are We Too Emotional
Are we really too emotional
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more