Winger argues his objections to presuppositionalism are biblical, not soteriological, and would hold even if he were Calvinist
Winger's clarification before asking Sye to explain presuppositionalism
Sye acknowledges Winger's critique as kind though erroneous;
Next →Sye explains presuppositionalism: start with the presupposit
Responses
@KuiperBelt117 Interesting. I changed my view away from Reformed soteriology whe
@KuiperBelt117 Interesting. I changed my view away from Reformed soteriology when I stopped binge listening to RC Sproul messages and started reading my Bible and letting it speak.
@BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 What leads you to believe I am unwise and unteac
@BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 What leads you to believe I am unwise and unteachable?
@MAClark85 @BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 How many times have I shared this fil
@MAClark85 @BaptistBavinck @Soteriology101 How many times have I shared this film, BTW? Since you know. And she's not my wife.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
Does Presup Apologetics Have a Biblical Foundation? Mike Winger vs Sye Ten Bruggencate @ 00:03:332018-08-16