Refutation of Jim's Gospel dating: scholars date Mark to the 50s–70s AD, and John to the 60s or 90s AD — not 170 AD; P52 papyrus (100–150 AD) proves John predates Jim's claim by decades

Citing Dan Wallace, Mike explains that the scholarly debate on John is between a 90s date (majority) and a 60s date (growing minority) — not 170 AD. The P52 papyrus (credit-card-sized fragment containing John 18:31–33) is dated 100–150 AD, which is physical evidence the Gospel of John existed before that window. No serious scholar holds the 170 AD date. Jim's information appears to be pre-20th-century scholarship that has since been overturned.