Jim's claim about Herod: Herod the Great wouldn't have cared about killing infant Jesus because life expectancy was ~35 years and he was already old and near death
Second major claim Mike refutes — the plausibility of the Massacre of the Innocents
Jim argues that the short life expectancy of the first century makes it implausible Herod would be threatened by an infant. Mike notes this argument is logically weak regardless of its factual accuracy — Herod was already beyond average life expectancy and still alive, so the short average doesn't affect his motivation.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more