Jim's claim about the longer ending of Mark: the final verses of Mark 16 were added in the 13th century by a Jewish council to harmonize it with other Gospels
Fourth major claim Mike refutes — the textual history of Mark's ending
Jim correctly identifies that Mark 16:9–20 (the longer ending) is a later addition, but wrongly attributes it to a 13th-century Jewish scholarly council. He seems uncertain even as he says it ('I think that's right').
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more