Analyzing Lauren Daigle's three non-answers: shame, tact, or genuine confusion?

He refuses to attribute the worst motive (cynical PR move), but also refuses to let the ambiguity go unchallenged. He poses three possible explanations: (1) Shame — knowing the truth but feeling social pressure makes saying it unbearable; (2) Tact that becomes compromise — saying 'I don't know' to avoid the conversation, which is dropping the ball; (3) Genuine confusion — possibly exposed to revisionist arguments like Matthew Vines'. Winger is most sympathetic to the third, taking her at face value when she says 'read the Bible and find out.'