The Jesus Seminar and the consequence of rejecting eyewitness origins
Mike explains what is at stake if the Gospels are not rooted in eyewitness accounts.
If the Gospels do not trace to eyewitnesses, scholars can arbitrarily decide what Jesus "really" said. The Jesus Seminar (1990s, including Ehrman) voted on which red-letter statements Jesus actually made, reducing most of them to inauthentic. Ehrman's own view is that Jesus used "Son of Man" to refer to someone other than himself. Mike argues this approach lets scholars construct any Jesus they desire — each ends up with a tailor-made Jesus. But if Gospels trace to eyewitnesses, this deconstruction is not valid.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more