Argument from consciousness: mind and matter are ontologically distinct; consciousness is irreducible to physical processes (the hard problem of consciousness)
John explains the argument from consciousness more fully
John explains that the argument from consciousness rests on the ontological distinction between mind and matter. You cannot reduce consciousness to physical processes — an alien who fully understood human physiology still could not know what it is like for a human to feel sad. This is called the "hard problem of consciousness." Since immaterial thoughts cannot be extended in time and space, they are a different kind of substance than the physical body. This raises the question: where does the non-physical come in? On naturalism, getting mind from matter is like getting something non-wood from a pile of wood.
← Previous
John McCrae's favored arguments: contingency, Kalam, J.P. Mo
Next →Tim McGrew and Lydia McGrew's paper on miracles and the resu
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus
Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona — Kindle highlights from 'The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus'. 110 highlights.
Scripture Commentary
article
Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions
Gregory Koukl — Kindle highlights from 'Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions'. 123 highlights.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more