Definition of atheism debate: classical (affirming God does not exist) vs. modern redefinition as "lack of belief" to avoid burden of proof
Q&A question from Isaiah Armstrong about the definition of atheism
John explains that the classical definition of atheism is the positive claim "God does not exist," but many modern atheists redefine it as merely a "lack of belief" to avoid carrying a burden of proof. John notes this may be partly motivated by that goal. He argues pragmatically: rather than debating the definition, clarify what the person actually believes and respond to that. Cameron agrees: skip the definition debate and get to the arguments.
← Previous
Humans are worse than they think they are, but Christ loves
Next →Q&A: Why doesn't God interact visibly today as in Bible time
Responses
Theology
verse entry
Genesis 2:15-20
Sections: cross_references, debate_points, exegesis, greek_analysis
Pulpit
research note
Commentary: Naming as Epistemology, Not Authority
Ardavanis says: > "Adam is given the responsibility of naming Eve, providing indication of God's design of the male operating in leadership with responsibility." The text gives its own stated purpos
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more