Twitter respondents define "extraordinary claim" as low prior probability
Part of Mike's data-gathering from Twitter atheists about how they define the slogan's terms.
Multiple atheist respondents converged on the definition that an extraordinary claim is one with low inherent or prior probability — i.e., statistically unlikely. Mike finds this definition relatively clear and will later challenge whether it applies to the resurrection.
← Previous
Problem 2: No clear definition of what "extraordinary" means
Next →Twitter respondents cannot define "extraordinary evidence" —
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: Women Apostles
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 5 on whether women were apostles in the New Testament
Scripture Commentary
article
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong With Genesis 1–3: ‘Was Women’s Submission Just A Curse To Be Overturned?’
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 2 on Genesis 1-3 and whether women's submission was just a curse to be overturned
Scripture Commentary
article
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus
Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona — Kindle highlights from 'The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus'. 110 highlights.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more