Biblical cosmology should not be assumed to match ancient Near Eastern flat-earth cosmology just because surrounding cultures believed it; Genesis radically demythologizes creation compared to the Enuma Elish
Response to question about Hebraic cosmology and the flat-earth interpretation
Winger is skeptical that the OT teaches a flat earth or solid dome. His argument: (1) The claim is driven by parallels with surrounding cultures, not by clear OT teaching; (2) Even if all surrounding cultures believed something, that does not mean biblical revelation teaches the same thing. He uses creation narratives as an example: the Enuma Elish presents Marduk slaying Tiamat and her body becoming the cosmos, while Genesis radically demythologizes creation. The sun, moon, stars, earth, and oceans are not deified in Genesis, just created objects. The biblical creation account differs markedly from ANE cosmologies despite surface similarities, suggesting the Bible deliberately counters the surrounding worldview.
← Previous
Jesus had no pre-existent human body; John 1:14 says the Wor
Next →Worship songs with questionable original contexts may be acc
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more