John 8 (woman caught in adultery) has significant textual critical issues; there is no good case for identifying her as Mary Magdalene; the absence of the man reflects a real double standard
Response to question about the woman caught in adultery
Winger notes he has never heard a good case for the woman being Mary Magdalene and would not assert it. The absence of the man does appear to be a double standard; he speculates the man may have fled. However, the main emphasis of the passage is Jesus's response, and the absence of the man would not change that. He also flags that John 8 has significant textual issues covered in his Evidence for the Bible series.
← Previous
Hebrews 6 is best read as a corporate statement about Israel
Next →John 20:17 — 'Do not cling to me' means do not grasp or hold
Responses
Scripture Commentary
tweet
@BKitten16 @ToupeeCostanza @rightresponsem Paul considered himself the h ce used of sinners because he was responsible for putting Christians to death and imprisonment. “Now Saul approved of putting him to death.” (Ac 8:1) As for the woman caught i...
@BKitten16 @ToupeeCostanza @rightresponsem Paul considered himself the h ce used of sinners because he was responsible for putting Christians to death and imprisonment. “Now Saul approved of putting
Scripture Commentary
article
To Diane Sellner Of Carm
**October 2008 addition Note: A public statement regarding Diane Sellner’s role in the public attacks against me is at
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more