The false dichotomy makes 119's interpretation agreeable in isolation but wrong in exclusivity

Winger argues he could agree with definitions 1-3 from 119 (law of God, law of sin, law of sin and death) — he is not under any of those. But he is still under the law of the Spirit of life, law of faith, law of righteousness, law of Christ. The error is treating the list as mutually exclusive rather than cumulative.