Q&A: Formal argument against Christianity being merely a social construct — resurrection, sudden doctrinal appearance, cumulative case

Every argument for Christianity (resurrection evidence, scriptural inspiration, transformed lives, cumulative case) functions as an argument against Christianity being merely a social construct. Additional argument: core Christian doctrines did not develop gradually over time but appeared suddenly and fully formed with the resurrection of Christ — unlike social constructs which evolve organically. Also, if Christianity 'works' socially that is somewhat a compliment but does not mean it is only a construct.