Roman historians didn't mention Jesus more because he wasn't significant to Roman history — they didn't even mention Pontius Pilate, known only from Philo, Josephus, and NT sources
Explaining the relative silence of Roman sources about Jesus
Roman historians focused on Roman affairs of Roman significance. Pontius Pilate — the prefect/procurator of Judea — is not mentioned in any Roman sources of the first century. He is known only from Philo, Josephus, and New Testament literature. Pilate mattered to Jews and Christians, not to Roman historians. The same principle applies to Jesus.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more