Objection that scholars affirm historicity only because they signed faith statements is refuted by citing atheist/agnostic scholars who agree
Responding to the claim that Christian bias explains scholarly consensus on historicity
The claim that scholars affirm historicity only due to Christian bias or signed faith statements is refuted by naming non-Christian scholars who agree: Bart Ehrman (agnostic/atheist), Maurice Casey (agnostic), Garrett Lüdemann (atheist New Testament scholar), Joseph Hoffmann (agnostic), James Crossley (agnostic). Crossan and Steven Patterson of the Jesus Seminar call themselves Christians but do not believe in a personal creator God.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more