Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Response to Trinitarian harmony #1: it assumes a single, limited intention for each person of the Trinity without scriptural proof

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement 00:17:36 – 00:19:07

First of Mike's in-principle objections to the Trinitarian harmony argument.

The argument depends on an unproven assumption: that the Father's sole intention is to save only the elect. Mike argues there is no clear Scripture passage establishing this premise. Agreement that Father elects, Son pays, Spirit actualizes does not require limiting the Son's work to only the elect.

← Previous

Scripture should trump philosophical reasoning; most limited

1 John 2:2 refutes Trinitarian harmony: Jesus is propitiatio

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

Judas the Betrayer and the death of Jesus

We have just released part 2 of our video project on the Sovereignty of God. And we have released this part of the project for free! Why? Because I felt that the message was so important that I didn’t want any hindrance I wanted to get as wide a viewing as possible.

Scripture Commentary article

No man left behind: Jesus died for all

Did Jesus’ death leave no man left behind that was not covered by His death on the cross? For many Christians who identify as Calvinists, the gospel includes the conclusion that Jesus died only for a select group of people who were predetermined by God before the world was created.

Scripture Commentary tweet

@ThePastorBurris Unlimited atonement, reconciliation limited to those whose fait

@ThePastorBurris Unlimited atonement, reconciliation limited to those whose faith is in Christ.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more

Video

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement @ 00:17:36

2019-07-24