Communion/eucharist: real and important but not transubstantiation; early church writings are secondary to Scripture; John 6 is not about communion
Q from Chris Middleton about Mike's views on communion/eucharist and how much weight early church writings should carry.
Righteous anger is anger that is rightly caused and rightly
Next →Rapture at the Feast of Trumpets: possible hint from typolog
Responses
@PrayTheRosary12 If by ‘Catholic’ you mean following Christ and His teachings, a
@PrayTheRosary12 If by ‘Catholic’ you mean following Christ and His teachings, absolutely. But if you mean praying to saints, treating Mary as a mediatrix, or worshipping the Eucharist, that’s another
@DavidGalle94823 @HagemanJack @smashbaals All 3 of those things⎯infant baptism, baptismal regeneration and a representation of the literal sacrifice in the 'eucharist' are all provably false teachings by what we have in scripture. Whatever they held ...
@DavidGalle94823 @HagemanJack @smashbaals All 3 of those things⎯infant baptism, baptismal regeneration and a representation of the literal sacrifice in the 'eucharist' are all provably false teachings
@MaineMinistry @MikeWingerii I have concerns with their mass and what seems to m
@MaineMinistry @MikeWingerii I have concerns with their mass and what seems to me to be treating the wafer in what they call Eucharist as Jesus Himself putting it in its own house and bowing to it—yet
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more