Communion/eucharist: real and important but not transubstantiation; early church writings are secondary to Scripture; John 6 is not about communion
Q from Chris Middleton about Mike's views on communion/eucharist and how much weight early church writings should carry.
Mike's core principle: Scripture is the final authority; early church writers are not apostles. He illustrates doctrinal drift using Calvary Chapel's 50-year evolution as an analogy—what begins contextually (hippies with guitars) gets formalized into an untouchable icon. He believes communion is real, meaningful, and God-ordained—not an empty symbol—but rejects transubstantiation. John 6 is not about communion (there is no Last Supper in John's Gospel) and Jesus says "the flesh profits nothing." The physical eating/drinking in John 6 means believing/trusting in Christ. He also critiques the Catholic practice of withholding the cup from laity and the doctrinal gymnastics that followed at Trent.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more