Parallelomania: ancient Near Eastern parallels (flood, creation) do not prove the Bible borrowed; similarities are explained by common events or themes
Q from Folky about how to respond to claims that the OT is not true because the Bible copied surrounding cultures (flood, Exodus).
Mike introduces the scholarly concept of "parallelomania"—the 1800s trend of finding parallels between the Bible and Babylonian/Egyptian texts and concluding the Bible copied them. He argues this is simplistic: when read in detail (e.g., the Enuma Elish), the differences from Genesis are vast and theologically fundamental (one eternal God vs. polytheistic pantheon, God creates by word vs. blood-spilling of cosmic monsters, creation is ordered not chaotic). Similarities are better explained by: (a) these are both creation accounts addressing the same question; (b) for the flood, a catastrophic event that left a human memory across cultures. The biblical account would be the accurate one; other flood narratives corroborate a real event.
← Previous
Michael Heiser: highly commended as a scholar-communicator;
Next →Evidence for the Exodus exists and is growing; Inspiring Phi
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more