Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Parallelomania: ancient Near Eastern parallels (flood, creation) do not prove the Bible borrowed; similarities are explained by common events or themes

20 Questions with Pastor Mike (Episode 2) 00:53:18 – 00:56:53

Q from Folky about how to respond to claims that the OT is not true because the Bible copied surrounding cultures (flood, Exodus).

Mike introduces the scholarly concept of "parallelomania"—the 1800s trend of finding parallels between the Bible and Babylonian/Egyptian texts and concluding the Bible copied them. He argues this is simplistic: when read in detail (e.g., the Enuma Elish), the differences from Genesis are vast and theologically fundamental (one eternal God vs. polytheistic pantheon, God creates by word vs. blood-spilling of cosmic monsters, creation is ordered not chaotic). Similarities are better explained by: (a) these are both creation accounts addressing the same question; (b) for the flood, a catastrophic event that left a human memory across cultures. The biblical account would be the accurate one; other flood narratives corroborate a real event.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Ask Claude about this