Groothuis's three qualifications — permanent, comprehensive, ontologically grounded — do not describe what complementarians actually believe or what the Bible teaches.
Mistake #4: Rebutting Groothuis's qualifications
Mike challenges each of Groothuis's three qualifications for women's subordination (permanent, comprehensive, ontologically grounded), arguing these are not what complementarians are saying and not what the Bible teaches.
← Previous
Mike agrees women are not inferior persons but argues that s
Next →Rebuttal: women's submission is not permanent — it is limite
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
Scripture Commentary
article
Why Mike Winger is Wrong About “Authenteō” in 1 Timothy 2:12 – and Why It Matters
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the meaning of authenteō in 1 Timothy 2:12
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more