Genesis 9 — Noah cursed Canaan for Ham's sin because Canaan was likely complicit, not just punished for his father's actions
Question from Caleb McMurtry about why Noah cursed Canaan rather than Ham.
Mike reads the curse of Canaan (Genesis 9) plainly — Noah cursed Canaan, not Ham. He acknowledges the surface-level unfairness but argues the text gives us only a partial account. Ham's sin (whatever it was — possibly more perverse than a simple accidental viewing of nudity) likely involved Canaan as well. Canaan may have participated in or perpetuated the sin. Mike's principle: filling in the blanks with "there must have been more" is more intellectually honest than demanding the text provide all details and then calling it unjust.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more