Interpretation of Genesis must be driven by hermeneutics, not science
Mike's methodological conclusion on the Genesis-evolution question.
Whatever science says, you do not read any text by first consulting external evidence and then forcing the text to conform. Genesis must be read on its own terms. His departure from confident young-earth creationism was driven entirely by hermeneutical questions (genre, consistency) not by scientific pressure. He anticipates this will upset some people and accepts that.
← Previous
Survey of interpretive views on Genesis 1-2: gap theory, day
Next →Question: A website claims ADHD and all mental illness are c
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Scripture Commentary
article
Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz
## Challenging my position that 1 Timothy 2:15 is a single woman
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more