Christians can hold various views on Genesis 1 and the Big Bang; the Big Bang is actually strong evidence for God.
Question 11 from J James about whether the Big Bang is biblical.
Mike is currently uncertain about his view of Genesis 1 (previously held young-earth creationism but found other views compelling). He presents several interpretive options: (1) local/earth-focused reading — light on Day 1 refers to the local environment, not excluding earlier cosmic light from a Big Bang; (2) progressive creation — each day spans large time spans; (3) poetic/theological purpose — Genesis 1 counters pagan creation myths (e.g., Enuma Elish), with the theological point being God alone created. On the Big Bang: scientists in the 1920s resisted it because it implies the universe had a beginning — pointing to a transcendent, powerful, intelligent, personal Creator. The Big Bang is therefore strong positive evidence for theism. Key figures: Georges Lemaitre, Hubble, Einstein.
← Previous
Psalm 82 gods (elohim) most likely refers to earthly rulers
Next →Mark 14:36 refutes Oneness Pentecostal modalism by demonstra
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women
Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)
Scripture Commentary
article
What Mike Winger Gets Wrong on What Women Can’t Do
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 13 on what women can and can't do according to the Bible
Scripture Commentary
article
The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more