Objection: this only gets you to generic theism, not the Christian God. Response: each attribute (spaceless, timeless, etc.) was justified, not ad hoc; the Kalam is meant to be followed by evidence for the resurrection to identify the God.

Braxton: we're not claiming this proves all of Christian theology. It establishes theism, which can then be combined with a case for the resurrection of Jesus to identify this God. Mike: this rules out many religious views and narrows the field to Abrahamic religions. Believing in God removes the compulsion to reject miracles a priori, opening the door to evaluating resurrection evidence.