Q&A: The Kalam's premises can be confirmed — an infinite past is philosophically untenable, and universal human experience confirms that things beginning to exist have causes with zero counterexamples.
Q&A — can the Kalam premises be confirmed?
Braxton reiterates the infinite-past arguments. Mike notes 100% of experience supports Premise 1 with zero counterexamples. He observes that in debates, Christians bring structured arguments while atheists typically only offer "I'm not convinced" — the weakest possible objection (Matt Dillahunty and Cosmic Skeptic explicitly advocate this strategy).
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...moreVideo
One effective way to show people God REALLY exists (with objections answered) @ 01:17:592020-02-12