Drew's Question 1: Why did God communicate through literature? Literature demands interpretation, leading to contradictory sects and suffering (e.g., JW blood transfusions). If God couldn't do better, he's not omnipotent; if he didn't know, not omniscient; if he didn't care, not omni-benevolent.

Drew structures his argument like Epicurus' trilemma applied to communication method. He uses JW blood transfusions as an example of interpretive disagreement causing suffering. Concludes that a tri-omni God wouldn't communicate through a medium prone to misinterpretation.