Drew's arbitrary cruel God is defeated by evidence: Christianity has historical verification, prophecy, testimony, and wasn't made up on the spot. A maximally cruel God would send everyone to hell with no heaven, giving no reason to worship. This is the "Pascal's mugger" objection, already addressed in literature.
Response to Q2 — arbitrary claims vs evidenced claims
The cruel-God objection is a known variant called "Pascal's mugger" — someone making unfounded threats. Pascal can ignore the mugger because the claim is evidently made up. Christianity has evidence distinguishing it from arbitrary claims: historical verification, revelatory nature (prophecy), testimony of millions. Cameron adds: a maximally cruel God would offer no heaven at all, removing all incentive.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more