Cameron and Mike discuss animal suffering as a serious philosophical problem, but note: (1) atheism offers no solution to suffering at all, (2) Christianity promises resolution (Isaiah 11 — wolf lies down with lamb), (3) Stephen Wykstra's no-see-um principle: we wouldn't expect to perceive overarching goods from specific instances of suffering.
Animal suffering — atheism vs Christianity
Cameron takes animal suffering seriously as a philosophical problem. Mike responds: atheism has the problem worse — suffering exists with no explanation, no solution, and no framework for why opposing evil matters. Christianity promises cosmic resolution. Stephen Wykstra's skeptical theism: just as not seeing worms in your yard doesn't mean they're absent, not seeing the purpose of specific suffering doesn't mean there isn't one.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more