Q: Is the Book of Mormon right? No. It lacks theology (just a long story), but fails on historical/archaeological claims: horses in pre-Columbian Americas, weapons and materials that didn't exist, no verifiable rivers/mountains/civilizations. Not a single Book of Mormon claim has been archaeologically confirmed, unlike the Bible.
Q&A — Book of Mormon
Responses
@TheGermanicist @imsofuckindone0 It doesn’t matter if there are golden plates an
@TheGermanicist @imsofuckindone0 It doesn’t matter if there are golden plates and the translation is true because the Book of Mormon contradicts the Bible making it false.
@TheGermanicist @bulldogbkb Why is the Book of Mormon needed for this? The Bible is extremely clear on this. If you insist that Son of God means spirit child of the Father and a heavenly Mother, even if an angel told you this or you heard a voice fr...
@TheGermanicist @bulldogbkb Why is the Book of Mormon needed for this? The Bible is extremely clear on this. If you insist that Son of God means spirit child of the Father and a heavenly Mother, even
@TeeplesCY Joseph Smith was a false prophet. His teachings are evidence. The Book of Mormon claims Lehi and Nehi were told to disobey the instruction of Jeremiah and flee to America and not to submit to Nebuchadnezzar when all people, good or bad, m...
@TeeplesCY Joseph Smith was a false prophet. His teachings are evidence. The Book of Mormon claims Lehi and Nehi were told to disobey the instruction of Jeremiah and flee to America and not to submit
Contending with Christianity's Critics: Answering New Atheists and Other Objectors
Paul Copan and William Lane Craig — Kindle highlights from '>-'. 16 highlights.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more