Q: Was Paul a false apostle (Revelation 2:2)? No — Revelation 2:2 actually proves Paul IS a true apostle. The Ephesians could identify false apostles AND they received Paul warmly (Ephesians letter, Acts 20). Peter calls Paul's writings "Scripture" (2 Peter 3:16). Paul-denial movements strip the NT to smuggle in cult theology.
Q&A — Paul as false apostle (Revelation 2:2)
Rev 2:2: Ephesus tested false apostles. But Ephesians clearly received Paul (Paul's warm letter to them, Acts 20 — Paul leads Ephesian elders). If Ephesus was discerning enough to catch false apostles and accepted Paul, he's a true apostle. Peter calls Paul's writings "Scripture" (2 Peter 3:16). Luke (author of Acts) confirms Paul's apostleship. Paul-denial movements are dangerous and cultish.
Responses
Scripture Commentary
article
Why Mike Winger is Wrong About “Authenteō” in 1 Timothy 2:12 – and Why It Matters
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the meaning of authenteō in 1 Timothy 2:12
Scripture Commentary
article
What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11)
Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 10 on the head covering debates in 1 Corinthians 11
Scripture Commentary
article
1 Timothy 212 Prohibitions Revisited
I started a post months ago and then life became so complicated I had to set my blog aside to cope. This post will now be the new “home” on the discussion on whether 1 Timothy 2:12 has two prohibitions or one
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more