McDowell responds to Moss's dismissal of Nero persecution: (1) 50-year gap doesn't warrant dismissal — McDowell's father remembers Nixon 50 years ago. (2) Suetonius provides additional support she doesn't cite. (3) Her claim that "Christian" wasn't used until end of first century is false — Acts records the term at Antioch c.47 AD. (4) Tacitus says "great multitude" — not a handful. Nero needed a sufficiently large scapegoat group.
Responding to Moss on Nero — four rebuttals
Moss dismisses Nero account because: (a) 50-year gap (but we routinely accept 50-year-old testimony), (b) "Christian" is anachronistic (but Acts places the term at Antioch ~47 AD, two decades before Nero), (c) only a tiny group (but Tacitus says "great multitude" — the scapegoat strategy required a known, sizable, hateable group). McDowell notes Moss's inconsistency: she accepts that "martyr" predates its later technical meaning, but won't extend the same logic to "Christian."
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more