Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Bible study argument introduced: Paul's context in 1 Corinthians 11 and Ephesians does not imply authority

Male Headship： Is it REALLY Biblical？ Women in Ministry part 8 00:08:42 – 00:09:12

Mike introduces the third egalitarian argument — the contextual/exegetical claim.

Egalitarians argue that in the direct context of 1 Corinthians 11 and Ephesians where Paul discusses headship, he does not imply authority. They claim 'head' means the man is the source of the woman (as Eve from Adam) and there is nothing in those contexts about authority or submission.
← Previous

Church history argument introduced: Chrysostom supposedly sh

 Next →

Greek/lexical argument introduced: kephale means 'source' in

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

Women In Ministry Research Notes

Collection of 22 research notes from Cheryl Schatz's Logos notebook on women in ministry, covering head coverings in 1 Corinthians 11, kephale as source, Genesis creation narratives, Ephesians 5 mutual submission, and Craig Keener's lecture notes on women's ordination.
Scripture Commentary article

κεφαλή (kephale) — Logos Clippings (Cheryl Schatz)

A curated collection of Logos Bible Software clippings compiled by Cheryl Schatz examining the Greek word κεφαλή (kephale) and Hebrew רֹאשׁ (rosh). The clippings draw from lexicons, encyclopedias, commentaries, and academic journals to argue that "source/origin" is the primary metaphorical meaning of kephale rather than "authority/leader," with implications for interpreting 1 Corinthians 11, Ephesians 5, and Colossians 1.
Scripture Commentary article

Communion & Lord's Supper — Research Notes (Cheryl Schatz)

Collection of 19 research notes on communion and the Lord's Supper, focusing on 1 Corinthians 10-11. Covers the body of Christ as the church (not transubstantiation), corporate vs. individual worship, discerning the body as recognizing fellow believers, the love feast/agape meal tradition, and self-examination.
Scripture Commentary article

1 Corinthians 14 — Research Notes (Cheryl Schatz)

Collection of 5 research notes examining 1 Corinthians 14:34-36, including the eta particle argument for quotation/refutation reading, the non-existent 'law' reference, segregated seating problems, and commentary from RtNT and Bender showing contradictions with Paul's affirmation of women prophesying.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Video

Male Headship： Is it REALLY Biblical？ Women in Ministry part 8 @ 00:08:42

2022-07-18

Tags

1 Corinthians 11 Ephesians 5 contextual argument
Ask Claude about this