Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Even if Groothuis is right philosophically, her conclusion explicitly blocks Bible reading — she says there can be 'no biblical or theological warrant' for women's submission, which pre-determines what the Bible is allowed to say.

Why We Can't Think Biblically About It: Women In Ministry part 1 00:43:46 – 00:45:18

Mistake #4: How Groothuis's argument bypasses scripture

Mike quotes Groothuis's conclusion from Discovering Biblical Equality ch. 20: 'There can be no biblical or theological warrant for a woman's permanent, comprehensive, and ontologically grounded submission to man's authority.' Mike highlights the word 'warrant' — her philosophical argument is designed to tell you the Bible is not allowed to support complementarianism. This leaves only two options: the Bible supports egalitarianism, or the Bible is wrong.

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.

...more

Ask Claude about this