Browse / Mike Winger / Idea

Conclusions from manuscript evidence: most scholars rightly reject interpolation

5 Views on “Women Keep Silent＂ (1 Cor 14_35-36)： Women in Ministry part 11 00:19:58 – 00:21:00

Mike summarizes what the manuscript evidence teaches about the authenticity of the passage.

Three key takeaways: (1) It is easy for unlearned people to be swayed by the relocation argument, but most scholars rightly reject the interpolation view. (2) Bruce Metzger, one of the premier textual critics in history, believed the relocation was simply a scribe who thought the passage flowed better in a different order. (3) Not a single manuscript lacks these verses.

← Previous

Manuscript 88 is a 12th-century copy and carries little weig

Bruce Metzger's explanation for the manuscript displacement

Responses

Scripture Commentary article

Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women

Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)

Scripture Commentary article

What Winger Presently Gets Wrong: “Women Keep Silent” (1 Cor 14:34–35)

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 11 on 'women keep silent' in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35

Scripture Commentary tweet

@BronWen727104 @RenewedReformed @sola_chad Philip Payne argues for this idea but I don’t believe it is faithful to the early manuscript evidence. I believe Paul was quoting the Corinthians and so intentionally put v34-35 in, though some scribes later...

@BronWen727104 @RenewedReformed @sola_chad Philip Payne argues for this idea but I don’t believe it is faithful to the early manuscript evidence. I believe Paul was quoting the Corinthians and so inte

Your Tags

Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more

Video

5 Views on “Women Keep Silent＂ (1 Cor 14_35-36)： Women in Ministry part 11 @ 00:19:58

2022-12-04