Cheryl Schatz

Unfortunately I have a very unstable internet connection. I am going to try to answer a comment or two while I still have access.

Mark,
You said:

Cheryl you said the above thing to me again, but then right after it preceeded to address my answer to your question which supposedly i did not answer. Do you get it! You say i am avoiding your question, but then right after that engage with my answer.

Are you serious? The thought that anything that happens must be God’s plan is a “proof” that it was God’s will to name Eve? Honestly I didn’t see the proof. I thought you would be interacting with me from the text and when you did not, all I saw was you failing to answer my question.

You “answer” is conjecture that God ordains everything that happens. If that is the best that you can do, that God ordains the sin of Adam and He ordains that the serpent should deceive the woman, then that is going to be the best you can do. It isn’t good enough for me because I want a real answer from God’s word in the text. I guess that’s why I continue to be an egalitarian and have never been convinced by the comp argument that assumes their own argument from the text without defending it from the text.

Okay, I’ll see what I can do with your original tome.

Again, I love that you continue here with your challenges and arguments. I intend to find the truth from the text with the inspired words and the inspired grammar. If I just assumed my own view, I could not face my own failure. I would need to try harder.