pinklight

I see absolutely nothing stated in the text about Adam or anyone else developing/now having a sin nature. It is completely and totally absent. Would God have not stated something clearly that was this monumental? Why does everyone read it into the text? If, as egals, we claim to be so careful about what is and isn’t clearly evident and stated in the text regarding women and their ‘roles’, then why do we just jump right in there on this one and pronounce that there is, indeed, such a thing as a sin nature showing up here? It is like the emperor’s new clothes, if you ask me.

truthseeker,
It is CLEAR in Genesis that Adam rebelled (broke God’s command knowing what he was doing). “Rebel” is not in the text but the idea is there. I’m not reading into the text that he became a rebel.

What’s the nature of a rebel? Sin?