SM
2010-05-29
NN (413)
“I think perhaps you mistook the meaning of my argument. It was simply in response to the repeated statements to the effect that:
‘ Since the word “eros” is not in the Bible, the concept is
not Biblical.'”
NN, this was not the repeated statement by me anyway or what I have understood others to be saying on this issue. I do not recall claiming that eros is not a biblical concept. What as been asked by me and other commenters is for you to show where it is “apparent” in Eph 5:22 and all the other scripture you have read that supports your claim that the presence of eros in marriage constitutes the basis for hierarchy.
Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more