Tiffany

Cheryl,
You may have missed my comment, but I am attempting to wrap up my part of this conversation today or tomorrow. As such if you do have any more response to my response now would be a good time to engage in it.

As for how you are treated on other blogs, not really the issue. On this discussion I have seen complementarian thought described as “abusive” “trauma inducing” “something that all Christians should find abhorant” “unhealthy” and others. You jumped on the attack towards me for something you thought I was going to get around to saying (blaming your husband) TL jumped on me saying that I was attacking her relationship with Christ and it would be behoove me to explain myself, and yet when I have suggested we stick to the arguments at hand and maybe tone it down a notch I was told I was taking things too personal. And going back and reading previous blog entries and discussions this doesn’t seem to be out of the norm.

But once again, not really the issue at hand. I have continued to address one specific thing- The Christ/Church relationship and the distinctive of that that should be applied to the marriage relationship. I would love to continue and finish that discussion rather than leave it unfinished. But if you don’t want to you are of course under no obligation to do. And unlike comment 411 I will not take it as a sign of your inability to answer my questions. My most recent response to you on the subject of Christ/Church is paragraph two comment 412. If you decide to respond to that question then I think it will be more productive to settled that part of the question first rather than have a rather long comment about all the nuances that follow from the understand of the oneness Christ and the Church share.