Greg Anderson

Holy Toledo Batman! 400 and some odd comments and still going!!!

Re Tiffany #323, ~ you wrote:

“…It isn’t a 50/50 split oneness, or even a 51/49 split oneness, but a 100/0 split oneness. It is a good and joyful not forced freely given 100/0 split onesness… ”

I am not suggesting that you abandon your thesis affirming what many consider to be timeless and universal commands from the Apostle Paul concerning wifely submission to husbands — even though many of them are complete @**#oles (to use a colorful euphemism), but you might want to rethink what you use for illustrative support.

100/0 split oneness has no meaning because division by zero is undefined and will make any ratio meaningless. Why? Because in order for (100/0)=q to be a valid ratio, we have to find some number q when multiplied by zero will equal the original numerator of 100. No such number q can be found; zero multiplied by anything will always be zero.

The objection could be raised here that I am being nit-picky and overly pedantic. I think not, because if one’s foundation is rickety, it will carry over into what one sets out to show as valid.

and NN #207? I’m surprised that someone who holds a doctorate in Physics didn’t catch this.