pinklight

628

Personally, I prefer the term ‘mutuality’ and ‘mutualist’ over “egal” –

There just seems to be a whole bucket load of redefining.

Kay, yes, redefining is a HUGE problem, but it must be done in order for poor theology to be given a pass.

I use “egal” just cause it’s so common, but I’d prefer to use “hierachalists” for “comps” when I can remember to do so because it is more an accurate term from “complementarians”. And instead of “egalitarian” I like “complementarian” because of all the baggae that’s been attached to “egalitarian” and since it is a more accurate term for egals rather than hierarchalists. (Trying to unwind what’s been redefined)