pinklight

dogmadekate,

Which is part of why the complementarian view was confusing to me.

The comp view in as much as the Trinity is concerned definitely confused me also…The comp conceptualizes “the Christ” as a person/being, who’s nature’s cannot be seperated from eachother, when reading Ephesins 5, therefore looking on both his human and divine nature with emphasis ofcourse on his divine nature because of the authority it entails, rather than understanding the correct use of the term/title and that his nature’s can be seperated one from another. God did not die.

The whole idea that comps believe the husband to be like God to their wives…I just really don’t even know what to say about that except, maybe, wow. I’m really not trying to sound snarky, but that’s just, whoa.

Wow is right. I feel the same way. It’s pretty amazing isn’t it how one can elevate themselves so highly above another and what’s more is so highly even above the person who they are to be one with! When the husband is mapped to Christ and his saving work in Eph 5, it’s “how low can he go” not how high.