TL

“Now, clearly this hasn’t satisfied you and that is ok, but i only wanted to point out that it is possible and that Cheryl’s challenge relies on the faulty premise that one accept her contextual approach.”

That would be incorrect. Cheryl’s challenge relies on honest exegesis of a particular troubling section of Scripture that has been misinterpreted for much of Christianities history. And the point she has challenged you on has been overlooked and not adequately addressed by those who prefer to see gender hierarchy in the Body of Christ and life revolve around who has authority to rule over others and who doesn’t. Cheryl did not demand that you accept her approach, only explain how your view handles certain words. You have not done that. Instead you ignore their relevance and pretend it doesn’t matter.