Cheryl Schatz

Peter, I had not read your previous comment. Apparently you added a paragraph that was different than the one that did not show up when this blog was in limbo as I transferred my sites to a different provider. You wrote: More recently, I called you out again and you ignored that comment. Now you are accusing me of accusing you – and are trying to paint me as a dysfunctional, wounded person. I don’t know what comment you mean. I have let you know that I have been too busy to respond back as I have major deadlines and cannot spend working time on this blog. Frankly, I have not been able to catch up with all that you have written,. This is again what I mean about being too sensitive. You are accusing me of trying to paint you as “dysfunctional”. You have added a very perjorative term that I did not say and that term and anything like that did not enter my mind. You are extremely sensitive and you are responding to an attack that is not there. I have seen this many times and I have compassion for those who are hurting. I said I was praying for you because I care. I think it is obvious to those who read these responses that you are very sensitive and you feel attacked and are responding to the feeling of an attack that is real for you, but which does not exist in my words. Next comment on context.